{"issue_text":"Whether the default judgment debt of USD175,720 was affected by the conversion formula in s 4(1)(d) of S.I. 33/19","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Default judgment granted in USD; S.I. 33/19 introduced 1:1 conversion; first respondent paid in RTGS"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the first respondent's payment of ZW RTGS190,000 extinguished her entire obligation","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Payment made after currency conversion; applicant disputed extinguishment"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant obtained a default judgment against the first respondent for USD175,720 in February 2018. Following the introduction of RTGS dollars through S.I. 33/19 in February 2019, which converted USD-denominated assets and liabilities to RTGS dollars at a 1:1 rate, the first respondent paid ZW RTGS190,000 claiming this extinguished the judgment debt. The applicant disputed this, arguing the judgment debt fell within exemptions for foreign currency obligations.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases