{"issue_text":"Whether the application should be struck off for defective relief that differs from the pleaded case","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Draft order seeks to set aside additional judgments and unspecified arbitral awards beyond the rescission application"}
{"issue_text":"Whether failure to use prescribed form LCI renders the application fatally defective","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Application not brought in form LCI as required by rule 14(1)"}
{"issue_text":"Whether late filing of supporting affidavits by some applicants is fatal to the application","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Other applicants filed supporting affidavits more than one year after the application"}
{"issue_text":"Whether service out of time renders the application fatally defective","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Service effected 10 days after filing, exceeding the 5-day requirement"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicants sought condonation for late noting of an application for rescission of court order LC/H/ORD/98/15, but their draft order sought to set aside additional judgments and unspecified arbitral awards. The application suffered multiple procedural defects including defective relief, failure to use prescribed forms, late filing of supporting affidavits by some applicants, and service out of time.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases