Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Supreme Court

Musa Manyika v Leabridge Investments (Pvt) Ltd

SC 97/22

Case Details

Court
Supreme Court
Date
11 August 2022
Citation
SC 97/22
Neutral Citation
[2022] ZWSC 97
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal

Bench

Presiding
Gwaunza DCJ
Author
Hlatshwayo JA
Full Bench
Gwaunza DCJHlatshwayo JAMakoni JA
Areas of Law
Labour LawCivil Procedure
Keywords
rescissiondefault judgmentwilful defaultdisciplinary hearingreinstatement
Tags
rescission of judgmentdefault judgmentdisciplinary proceedingslabour dispute
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Labour Act
  • Labour Act
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the Labour Court erred in holding that the respondent was not in wilful default","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Respondent's legal practitioners did not file heads of argument; service was at business premises instead of legal practitioners' address; no notice of assumption of agency filed"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the Labour Court erred in holding that the respondent had a bona fide defence on the merits regarding the inclusion of paragraph 2 concerning charge 3","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Application for review filed on 16 December 2014; charge 3 hearing commenced 17 December 2014; paragraph 2 ordered remittal for hearing de novo"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

Appellant employee challenged disciplinary proceedings and obtained default judgment quashing proceedings and ordering reinstatement. Respondent successfully applied for partial rescission, arguing no wilful default and patent error regarding third charge. Appeal dismissed.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →