None – no Act of Parliament or codifying statute was interpreted or applied.
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the transfer order was lawful","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Transfer within same location, no change to terms, 2 days notice given"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the transfer constituted victimisation","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Some employees complied, those who didn't were charged"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Nine employees appealed against their dismissal for refusing to comply with a transfer order from Wholesale Fruiterers to Marlon Trading, both divisions of Interfresh Limited. The employees claimed the transfer was unlawful and constituted victimisation.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases