{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred in finding that respondent was unlawfully dismissed","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Fixed-term contracts, legitimate expectation, replacement hired"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred in awarding six months' salary as damages without evidence","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Dispute over when respondent found alternative employment"}
{"issue_text":"Whether respondent should have been awarded reinstatement","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Another person already employed in the position"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The respondent was employed by the appellant as Executive Director on yearly contracts from 2006. She was terminated on 3 November 2009 and replaced by another Executive Director. An arbitrator found this constituted unfair dismissal under section 12(3) of the Labour Act and awarded six months' salary as damages. Both parties appealed different aspects of the arbitrator's decision.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases