Musunga & Associates v Phanuel Kuchekengya

Key Issues

• {"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator erred in finding respondent was unfairly dismissed when dismissal followed SI 15/2006 procedures","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Procedural compliance with SI 15/2006"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator exceeded scope by considering substantive justice beyond procedural compliance","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Arbitrator's focus on substantive vs procedural fairness"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator erred in finding respondent not guilty of absenteeism","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Respondent's leave authorization dispute"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether matter was properly before arbitrator given failure to refer within seven days","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Time limits under SI 15/2006"}

Background