Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

MYDALE INTERNATIONAL MARKETING (PVT) LTD v DR ROB KELLY and HAMMER AND TONGUES (PVT) LTD

HH 4-2010

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
13 January 2010
Citation
HH 4-2010
Neutral Citation
[2010] ZWHH 4
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
GOWORA J
Full Bench
GOWORA J
Areas of Law
Civil procedureAppeal procedureExecution of judgments
Keywords
Interlocutory appealExecution suspendedLeave to executeContempt of courtLocus standi
Tags
Interlocutory orderAppeal suspensionExecution pending appeal
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • C
  • o
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • m
  • p
  • t
  • o
  • f
  • C
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 8
  • 1
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • A
  • p
  • p
  • e
  • a
  • l
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 6
  • 8
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • A
  • p
  • p
  • e
  • a
  • l
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 5
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 8
  • E
  • u
  • r
  • o
  • p
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • C
  • o
  • n
  • v
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • o
  • n
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • (
  • A
  • r
  • t
  • i
  • c
  • l
  • e
  • 6
  • )
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether applicant can enforce judgment without seeking leave to execute pending appeal","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"First respondent noted appeal; applicant sought immediate execution"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the appeal automatically suspends execution of the judgment","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Common law principle of automatic suspension upon noting appeal"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether applicant has locus standi to institute proceedings","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Dispute over share ownership; representative authority questioned"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant sought enforcement of an interlocutory order requiring the first respondent to deposit US$28,500 with the High Court Registrar pending determination of a share ownership dispute. The first respondent had noted an appeal against the order and refused to comply, arguing the appeal suspended execution. The applicant brought this application seeking contempt and payment of the money.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →