Share allotmentBinding agreementContract formationCorporate sharesAbsolution from instance
Tags
Share allocationContract lawCorporate law
legislation
Statutes Cited
Prescription Act
Companies Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether there was a binding and enforceable agreement between parties for allotment of 4,500,000 shares to plaintiff","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Verbal promise by Koudounaris, terms of alleged agreement, certainty of terms"}
{"issue_text":"Whether plaintiff's claim was prescribed by law","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Date of cause of action, three-year prescription period, timing of demand and institution"}
{"issue_text":"Whether defendant entitled to absolution from instance","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Strength of plaintiff's evidence, existence of binding contract"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Plaintiff, former director of defendant company, claims entitlement to 3,625,000 ordinary shares in Innsor Africa Limited based on alleged verbal agreement for 4,500,000 shares. Defendant denies existence of binding agreement and argues claim is prescribed.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases