{"issue_text":"Does the Labour Court have jurisdiction to grant an interdict?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant sought to bar respondent from conducting disciplinary hearing"}
{"issue_text":"Is the matter res judicata?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Multiple disciplinary proceedings for same absenteeism"}
{"issue_text":"Are allegations of bias and pre-determination well-founded?","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Applicant's fear that respondent would again violate Code of Conduct"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant, an Environmental Health Inspector employed by the City of Harare, sought to interdict the respondent from conducting an internal disciplinary hearing against her. She had previously been dismissed twice for absenteeism, but both dismissals were overturned through arbitration awards in her favour. After the second arbitration award, this court remitted the matter to the disciplinary committee for compliance with the Code of Conduct. The applicant feared the respondent would again violate its own Code of Conduct and sought an order barring them from conducting the hearing.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases