CHIDYAUSIKU CJMALABA DCJZIYAMBI JAGWAUNZA JAGARWE JAGOWORA JAHLATSHWAYO JAPATEL JAGUVAVA JA
Areas of Law
Constitutional LawCriminal Law
Keywords
freedom of expressioncriminal defamationconstitutional inconsistencysection 96Criminal Law Code
Tags
constitutional challengecriminal defamationfreedom of expression
legislation
Statutes Cited
Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act
Constitution of Zimbabwe (former)
Constitution of Zimbabwe (former)
Constitution of Zimbabwe (former)
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether section 96 of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23] is inconsistent with the freedom of expression guaranteed by section 20(1) of the former Constitution","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The applicants were charged with criminal defamation under section 96"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicants challenged the constitutionality of section 96 of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act, which criminalized defamation. The Constitutional Court had previously issued a rule nisi declaring the provision inconsistent with the constitutional right to freedom of expression.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases