{"issue_text":"Whether the marriage has irretrievably broken down","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Parties separated, plaintiff issued divorce proceedings"}
{"issue_text":"How should movable and immovable property be distributed","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Properties acquired during marriage, parties' contributions"}
{"issue_text":"Which party should be granted custody of the minor child","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Child's age, parties' agreement"}
{"issue_text":"What maintenance should be paid for the minor child","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Child's needs, defendant's capacity"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The parties married on 14 December 1991 and had two children. The marriage irretrievably broke down. Plaintiff sought divorce, property division, custody and maintenance. Most issues were agreed except distribution of Toyota Corolla vehicle and two immovable properties.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases