rescission of judgmentdefault judgmentarbitral award
legislation
Statutes Cited
C
o
n
t
e
m
p
t
o
f
C
o
u
r
t
A
c
t
1
9
8
1
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
P
r
o
c
e
d
u
r
e
R
u
l
e
s
2
0
0
5
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
P
r
o
c
e
d
u
r
e
R
u
l
e
s
2
0
1
0
P
o
l
i
c
e
a
n
d
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
E
v
i
d
e
n
c
e
A
c
t
1
9
8
4
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
A
c
t
1
9
9
8
E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n
C
o
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
o
n
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
,
A
r
t
i
c
l
e
6
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the default judgment should be rescinded","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant not in wilful default, respondent accepts explanation"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant employed the respondent as a computers teacher from September 2009 to March 2011. An arbitral award was granted on 7 April 2011 ordering the applicant to pay $3,186.35 in arrear salaries and benefits. The applicant appealed to the Labour Court but failed to attend court, resulting in a default judgment on 2 July 2012 confirming the arbitral award. The applicant now seeks rescission of that default judgment.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases