NU.COM (Private) Limited and Chakany Uka Karase and Matipedza Karase v NU Aero (Private) Limited and Fly Africa Limited and Low Cost Enterprises (Private) Limited
{"issue_text":"Whether leave is required under Order 6 r 44 to serve process outside Zimbabwe on a declaratory application","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Second respondent is Mauritius company; service by Fedex without leave"}
{"issue_text":"Whether service by courier and email confirmation is valid","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Service to South African lawyers; email confirmation of non-opposition"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicants sought a declaratory order that they remained 51% shareholders in the first respondent after the second respondent purported to acquire their shares via a default call option clause. The matter was postponed on a point in limine regarding improper service on the Mauritius-incorporated second respondent.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases