{"issue_text":"Whether the workers' conduct constituted collective job action under the Labour Act","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Workers gathered during work hours, production reduced, grievances related to employment"}
{"issue_text":"Whether selective dismissal of some workers amounted to unfair labour practice","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Other workers received warnings, appellants were dismissed"}
{"issue_text":"Whether there was sufficient evidence of Zvenyika's involvement beyond being go-between","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Zvenyika admitted not returning to work, relayed messages"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Fourteen employees of Cut Rag Processors were dismissed for participating in an unlawful collective job action between 5-7 January 2009. They appealed to the Labour Court. The company also cross-appealed against the reinstatement of one employee, Zvenyika.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases