Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court
Old Mutual Life Assurance Company (Zimbabwe) Limited v Merspin Limited and Old Mutual Property Investment Corporation (Pvt) Ltd v Zimbabwe Express Services (Pvt) Ltd and Gloweave (Pvt) Ltd and Anele Mnyandu
HH 170-11
Case Details
Court
Harare High Court
Date
31 August 2011
Citation
HH 170-11
Neutral Citation
[2011] ZWHH 170
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application
Bench
Presiding
GOWORA J
Full Bench
GOWORA J
Areas of Law
Commercial lawProperty lawContract law
Keywords
Lease cancellationRental arrearsEvictionSuretyshipBreach of contract
Tags
Lease agreementsCommercial propertyArrearsEviction
legislation
Statutes Cited
- I
- m
- m
- i
- g
- r
- a
- t
- i
- o
- n
- a
- n
- d
- A
- s
- y
- l
- u
- m
- A
- c
- t
- 1
- 9
- 9
- 9
- N
- a
- t
- i
- o
- n
- a
- l
- i
- t
- y
- ,
- I
- m
- m
- i
- g
- r
- a
- t
- i
- o
- n
- a
- n
- d
- A
- s
- y
- l
- u
- m
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 0
- 2
- I
- m
- m
- i
- g
- r
- a
- t
- i
- o
- n
- A
- c
- t
- 1
- 9
- 7
- 1
- H
- u
- m
- a
- n
- R
- i
- g
- h
- t
- s
- A
- c
- t
- 1
- 9
- 9
- 8
- E
- u
- r
- o
- p
- e
- a
- n
- C
- o
- n
- v
- e
- n
- t
- i
- o
- n
- o
- n
- H
- u
- m
- a
- n
- R
- i
- g
- h
- t
- s
- S
- p
- e
- c
- i
- a
- l
- I
- m
- m
- i
- g
- r
- a
- t
- i
- o
- n
- A
- p
- p
- e
- a
- l
- s
- C
- o
- m
- m
- i
- s
- s
- i
- o
- n
- A
- c
- t
- 1
- 9
- 9
- 7
- T
- r
- i
- b
- u
- n
- a
- l
- s
- a
- n
- d
- I
- n
- q
- u
- i
- r
- i
- e
- s
- A
- c
- t
- 1
- 9
- 9
- 2
- T
- r
- i
- b
- u
- n
- a
- l
- s
- ,
- C
- o
- u
- r
- t
- s
- a
- n
- d
- E
- n
- f
- o
- r
- c
- e
- m
- e
- n
- t
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 0
- 7
- C
- o
- u
- r
- t
- s
- a
- n
- d
- L
- e
- g
- a
- l
- S
- e
- r
- v
- i
- c
- e
- s
- A
- c
- t
- 1
- 9
- 9
- 0
- A
- c
- c
- e
- s
- s
- t
- o
- J
- u
- s
- t
- i
- c
- e
- A
- c
- t
- 1
- 9
- 9
- 9
- L
- e
- g
- a
- l
- A
- i
- d
- ,
- S
- e
- n
- t
- e
- n
- c
- i
- n
- g
- a
- n
- d
- P
- u
- n
- i
- s
- h
- m
- e
- n
- t
- o
- f
- O
- f
- f
- e
- n
- d
- e
- r
- s
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 1
- 2
- C
- o
- n
- s
- t
- i
- t
- u
- t
- i
- o
- n
- a
- l
- R
- e
- f
- o
- r
- m
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 0
- 5
- S
- u
- p
- r
- e
- m
- e
- C
- o
- u
- r
- t
- A
- c
- t
- 1
- 9
- 8
- 1
- S
- e
- n
- i
- o
- r
- C
- o
- u
- r
- t
- s
- A
- c
- t
- 1
- 9
- 8
- 1
- C
- i
- v
- i
- l
- P
- r
- o
- c
- e
- d
- u
- r
- e
- R
- u
- l
- e
- s
- 1
- 9
- 9
- 8
- I
- m
- m
- i
- g
- r
- a
- t
- i
- o
- n
- R
- u
- l
- e
- s
- H
- C
- 3
- 9
- 5
- A
- s
- y
- l
- u
- m
- a
- n
- d
- I
- m
- m
- i
- g
- r
- a
- t
- i
- o
- n
- (
- T
- r
- e
- a
- t
- m
- e
- n
- t
- o
- f
- C
- l
- a
- i
- m
- a
- n
- t
- s
- ,
- e
- t
- c
- )
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 0
- 4
- B
- o
- r
- d
- e
- r
- s
- ,
- C
- i
- t
- i
- z
- e
- n
- s
- h
- i
- p
- a
- n
- d
- I
- m
- m
- i
- g
- r
- a
- t
- i
- o
- n
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 0
- 9
- I
- m
- m
- i
- g
- r
- a
- t
- i
- o
- n
- ,
- A
- s
- y
- l
- u
- m
- a
- n
- d
- N
- a
- t
- i
- o
- n
- a
- l
- i
- t
- y
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 0
- 6
- L
- e
- g
- a
- l
- A
- i
- d
- ,
- S
- e
- n
- t
- e
- n
- c
- i
- n
- g
- a
- n
- d
- P
- u
- n
- i
- s
- h
- m
- e
- n
- t
- o
- f
- O
- f
- f
- e
- n
- d
- e
- r
- s
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 1
- 2
- C
- r
- i
- m
- e
- a
- n
- d
- C
- o
- u
- r
- t
- s
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 1
- 3
- A
- n
- t
- i
- -
- s
- o
- c
- i
- a
- l
- B
- e
- h
- a
- v
- i
- o
- u
- r
- ,
- C
- r
- i
- m
- e
- a
- n
- d
- P
- o
- l
- i
- c
- i
- n
- g
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 1
- 4
- I
- m
- m
- i
- g
- r
- a
- t
- i
- o
- n
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 1
- 4
- I
- m
- m
- i
- g
- r
- a
- t
- i
- o
- n
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 1
- 6
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
- {"issue_text":"Whether the applicants are entitled to confirm cancellation of lease agreements due to respondents' breach","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Respondents admitted arrears; no agreement on later rental periods"}
- {"issue_text":"Whether the agreed rental amounts for July 2009-December 2010 are binding despite respondents' counter-offers","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"April 2010 counter-offer letter; January 2010 admission letter"}
- {"issue_text":"Whether Mnyandu is liable as surety for Zimbabwe Express's indebtedness","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Deed of suretyship executed; lease renewed with agreed rentals"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicants, Old Mutual companies, sought confirmation of cancellation of lease agreements with three corporate respondents (Merspin, Zimbabwe Express, Gloweave) due to rental arrears. All respondents occupied commercial properties in Bulawayo under different lease agreements but shared common controlling shareholders. The applicants claimed substantial arrears in rent and operating costs, while respondents disputed the agreed rental amounts for certain periods.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →
Legal Intelligence
for Africa.
for Africa.
Zalari is Zimbabwe and Southern Africa's leading AI-powered legal research platform, built by DeepCounsel and powered by Nyamaropa Technologies. Search Zimbabwe Supreme Court and High Court case law instantly, get AI-generated answers with full source citations, and access the most comprehensive corpus of Zimbabwean and Southern African jurisprudence available online. Zalari is the go-to legal AI platform for attorneys, advocates, law students, judges, and corporate counsel across Zimbabwe and South Africa — delivering faster research, smarter insights, and a competitive edge in legal practice. Zalari does not provide legal advice. Always consult a qualified legal practitioner for advice specific to your situation. © 2026 DeepCounsel — a legal technology company democratising access to legal knowledge in Africa.