Overtime paymentBurden of proofSection 125 Labour ActArbitrator awardDeed of settlement
Tags
Maternity leaveOvertime claimsDeed of settlementRes judicata
legislation
Statutes Cited
Labour Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether deed of settlement estopped appellant from pursuing appeal on overtime","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Deed signed after appeal filed; deed silent on pending matters"}
{"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator erred in limiting overtime award to proven three months","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appellant bore burden of proof; only proved three months"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Appellant employee claimed overtime and other benefits from respondent employer. Arbitrator awarded only partial overtime. Parties signed deed of settlement covering arbitrator's award while appeal was pending. Appellant continued appeal on overtime portion only.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases