Parks and Wildlife Management Authority and Minister of Environment, Climate Change Tourism and Hospitality v Suscaden Investments (Private) Limited and Big Five Safaris (Private) Limited and Parks and Wildlife Management Authority
{"issue_text":"Whether the lease agreement is valid without ministerial concurrence","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Minister denied signing; agreement explicitly required ministerial concurrence"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the agreement's duration exceeding 25 years renders it invalid","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Agreement duration was 25 years 3.5 months"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicants sought a declaration that a 2017 lease agreement between Parks and Wildlife Management Authority and Suscaden Investments was null and void for lack of ministerial concurrence as required by statute. The agreement covered 3 square kilometers in Chewore North Safari Area plus an additional 40 square kilometers. The Minister denied signing the agreement, while Suscaden claimed she had signed it.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases