Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Labour Court
Pauline Chikamba v Ellen Nyamanhindi N.O. and Civil Aviation Authority of Zimbabwe
[2025] ZWLC 159
Case Details
Court
Labour Court
Date
16 April 2025
Citation
[2025] ZWLC 159
Judgment No.
LC/H/159/25
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal
Bench
Presiding
L.M. Murasi J
Full Bench
L.M. Murasi J
Areas of Law
Labour lawEmployment lawDisciplinary procedures
Keywords
Willful disobedienceLawful instructionDesignated AgentDismissalAppeal
Tags
Disciplinary proceedingsDesignated AgentWillful disobedienceEmployment termination
legislation
Statutes Cited
- P
- o
- l
- i
- c
- e
- a
- n
- d
- C
- r
- i
- m
- i
- n
- a
- l
- E
- v
- i
- d
- e
- n
- c
- e
- A
- c
- t
- 1
- 9
- 8
- 4
- R
- e
- g
- u
- l
- a
- t
- i
- o
- n
- o
- f
- I
- n
- v
- e
- s
- t
- i
- g
- a
- t
- o
- r
- y
- P
- o
- w
- e
- r
- s
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 0
- 0
- C
- r
- i
- m
- i
- n
- a
- l
- P
- r
- o
- c
- e
- d
- u
- r
- e
- a
- n
- d
- I
- n
- v
- e
- s
- t
- i
- g
- a
- t
- i
- o
- n
- s
- A
- c
- t
- 1
- 9
- 9
- 6
- C
- r
- i
- m
- i
- n
- a
- l
- J
- u
- s
- t
- i
- c
- e
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 0
- 3
- H
- u
- m
- a
- n
- R
- i
- g
- h
- t
- s
- A
- c
- t
- 1
- 9
- 9
- 8
- E
- u
- r
- o
- p
- e
- a
- n
- C
- o
- n
- v
- e
- n
- t
- i
- o
- n
- o
- n
- H
- u
- m
- a
- n
- R
- i
- g
- h
- t
- s
- C
- r
- i
- m
- i
- n
- a
- l
- A
- p
- p
- e
- a
- l
- A
- c
- t
- 1
- 9
- 6
- 8
- S
- e
- n
- i
- o
- r
- C
- o
- u
- r
- t
- s
- A
- c
- t
- 1
- 9
- 8
- 1
- A
- c
- c
- e
- s
- s
- t
- o
- J
- u
- s
- t
- i
- c
- e
- A
- c
- t
- 1
- 9
- 9
- 9
- C
- o
- u
- r
- t
- s
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 0
- 3
- C
- o
- n
- s
- t
- i
- t
- u
- t
- i
- o
- n
- a
- l
- R
- e
- f
- o
- r
- m
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 0
- 5
- T
- r
- i
- b
- u
- n
- a
- l
- s
- ,
- C
- o
- u
- r
- t
- s
- a
- n
- d
- E
- n
- f
- o
- r
- c
- e
- m
- e
- n
- t
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 0
- 7
- C
- o
- r
- o
- n
- e
- r
- s
- a
- n
- d
- J
- u
- s
- t
- i
- c
- e
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 0
- 9
- L
- e
- g
- a
- l
- S
- e
- r
- v
- i
- c
- e
- s
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 0
- 7
- C
- r
- i
- m
- i
- n
- a
- l
- D
- e
- f
- e
- n
- c
- e
- S
- e
- r
- v
- i
- c
- e
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 0
- 6
- P
- r
- o
- c
- e
- e
- d
- s
- o
- f
- C
- r
- i
- m
- e
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 0
- 2
- S
- e
- r
- i
- o
- u
- s
- O
- r
- g
- a
- n
- i
- s
- e
- d
- C
- r
- i
- m
- e
- a
- n
- d
- P
- o
- l
- i
- c
- e
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 0
- 5
- S
- e
- r
- i
- o
- u
- s
- C
- r
- i
- m
- e
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 0
- 7
- C
- o
- u
- n
- t
- e
- r
- -
- T
- e
- r
- r
- o
- r
- i
- s
- m
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 0
- 8
- T
- e
- r
- r
- o
- r
- i
- s
- m
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 0
- 0
- T
- e
- r
- r
- o
- r
- i
- s
- m
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 0
- 6
- P
- r
- e
- v
- e
- n
- t
- i
- o
- n
- o
- f
- T
- e
- r
- r
- o
- r
- i
- s
- m
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 0
- 5
- C
- r
- i
- m
- i
- n
- a
- l
- J
- u
- s
- t
- i
- c
- e
- a
- n
- d
- I
- m
- m
- i
- g
- r
- a
- t
- i
- o
- n
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 0
- 8
- C
- r
- i
- m
- i
- n
- a
- l
- J
- u
- s
- t
- i
- c
- e
- a
- n
- d
- C
- o
- u
- r
- t
- S
- e
- r
- v
- i
- c
- e
- s
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 0
- 0
- Y
- o
- u
- t
- h
- J
- u
- s
- t
- i
- c
- e
- a
- n
- d
- C
- r
- i
- m
- i
- n
- a
- l
- E
- v
- i
- d
- e
- n
- c
- e
- A
- c
- t
- 1
- 9
- 9
- 9
- C
- r
- i
- m
- e
- a
- n
- d
- D
- i
- s
- o
- r
- d
- e
- r
- A
- c
- t
- 1
- 9
- 9
- 8
- C
- r
- i
- m
- i
- n
- a
- l
- P
- r
- o
- c
- e
- d
- u
- r
- e
- R
- u
- l
- e
- s
- 2
- 0
- 1
- 0
- C
- i
- v
- i
- l
- P
- r
- o
- c
- e
- d
- u
- r
- e
- R
- u
- l
- e
- s
- 1
- 9
- 9
- 8
- F
- a
- m
- i
- l
- y
- P
- r
- o
- c
- e
- d
- u
- r
- e
- R
- u
- l
- e
- s
- 2
- 0
- 1
- 0
- S
- u
- p
- r
- e
- m
- e
- C
- o
- u
- r
- t
- R
- u
- l
- e
- s
- 2
- 0
- 0
- 9
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
- {"issue_text":"Whether the Designated Agent erred on questions of law regarding willful disobedience of lawful instructions","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Appellant's interaction with LIT team, completion of network assessment, provision of audit information"}
- {"issue_text":"Whether appellant's grounds of appeal properly raised questions of law rather than factual disputes","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Formulation of grounds of appeal"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Appellant, employed by Civil Aviation Authority of Zimbabwe in ICT Department, was accused of willfully disobeying lawful instructions regarding work with LIT team and completing assigned tasks. After disciplinary proceedings before Designated Agent, she was found guilty and recommended for dismissal. She appeals against this decision.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →
Legal Intelligence
for Africa.
for Africa.
Zalari is Zimbabwe and Southern Africa's leading AI-powered legal research platform, built by DeepCounsel and powered by Nyamaropa Technologies. Search Zimbabwe Supreme Court and High Court case law instantly, get AI-generated answers with full source citations, and access the most comprehensive corpus of Zimbabwean and Southern African jurisprudence available online. Zalari is the go-to legal AI platform for attorneys, advocates, law students, judges, and corporate counsel across Zimbabwe and South Africa — delivering faster research, smarter insights, and a competitive edge in legal practice. Zalari does not provide legal advice. Always consult a qualified legal practitioner for advice specific to your situation. © 2026 DeepCounsel — a legal technology company democratising access to legal knowledge in Africa.