Penelope Douglas Stone & Richard Harold Stuart Beattie Trading as Stone/Beattie Studio Partnership v Central Africa Building Society & Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe & Minister of Finance and Economic Development
{"issue_text":"Whether the court a quo properly exercised constitutional jurisdiction in determining the application","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicants approached court under s 85(1) but included non-constitutional claims"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the applicants' cause of action was properly pleaded under s 85(1) of the Constitution","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Conflation of constitutional and non-constitutional issues in single application"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the doctrine of subsidiarity barred the constitutional challenge to the Exchange Control Directive","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Ultra vires challenge available under Exchange Control Regulations"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the matter was res judicata from previous Supreme Court proceedings","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no (court found it moot in confirmation proceedings)","related_facts":"Same parties, same subject matter, previous litigation under SC 15/21"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Applicants, who are architects and partners in an architectural firm, sought to access USD 142,000 from their account with Central Africa Building Society. The bank refused, citing Exchange Control Directive RT 120/2018 from the Reserve Bank which converted USD accounts to RTGS. The applicants challenged the constitutionality of this conversion and various related legislative provisions, claiming violation of their property rights under s 71 of the Constitution.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases