short time measuressection 12D Labour Actarbitral awardstay application
Tags
short time workingarbitral awardstay of execution
legislation
Statutes Cited
{'**statute_name**': 'Labour Act', '**chapter**': '[Chapter 28:01]', '**section**': '12D', '**subsection**': '–', '**treatment**': 'interpreted; decisive', '**for_proposition**': 'Establishes a peremptory 12-month ceiling on short-time measures; any extension is ultra vires and unenforceable.', '**interpretation**': '“for a period not exceeding twelve months” read literally as an absolute, non-renewable maximum.', '**verbatim**': '“…recourse either or both of the following measures for a period not exceeding twelve months…”'}
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the applicant has good prospects of success on appeal","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Section 12D Labour Act limits short time to 12 months"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the balance of convenience favours granting the stay","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Company services critical clients like Mutare General Hospital"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The respondents, employees of Perrens Dry Cleaners since 2002, successfully obtained an arbitral award against the company for unfair labour practice. The company had kept them on short time working arrangements beyond the 12-month period permitted by section 12D of the Labour Act. The company applied for a stay of execution pending its appeal against the arbitral award.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases