{"issue_text":"Whether defendant is entitled to equal share of immovable property","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Defendant's indirect contributions; no direct contribution to purchase price"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The parties married in 1993 and acquired immovable property through plaintiff's employer loan. Defendant made indirect contributions through household expenses while plaintiff paid loan. Parties agreed on divorce and movable property division but disputed immovable property sharing.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases