{"issue_text":"Whether applicants are entitled to an interdict preventing removal of first respondent's assets pending enforcement of arbitral award","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Arbitral award of $228,945; ongoing removal of cattle and implements; applicants' fear of irreparable harm"}
{"issue_text":"Whether affidavits commissioned by legal practitioners should be rejected for conflict of interest","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Affidavits commissioned by applicants' legal practitioners"}
{"issue_text":"Whether Central Estates (Pvt) Ltd is a properly cited party","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"First respondent claimed it does not exist"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Employees sought an urgent interdict to prevent their employer from removing cattle and farm implements from its farm pending enforcement of a $228,945 arbitral award for unpaid salaries and unfair dismissal. The employer had failed to comply with the award and was rapidly disposing of assets.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases