Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

PMA Real Estate Agency (Private) Limited v Agricultural and Rural Development Authority

HH 236-2011

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
1 November 2011
Citation
HH 236-2011
Neutral Citation
[2011] ZWHH 236
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Trial

Bench

Presiding
Patel J
Full Bench
Patel J
Areas of Law
Contract LawAdministrative LawPublic Procurement
Keywords
Procurement ActContract ValidityStatutory CompliancePublic Entity ContractsTender Procedures
Tags
Contract LawProcurement LawPublic Sector ContractsStatutory Compliance
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • J
  • u
  • s
  • t
  • i
  • c
  • e
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3
  • ,
  • s
  • 2
  • 2
  • 5
  • (
  • 3
  • )
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • e
  • (
  • S
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • n
  • c
  • e
  • s
  • )
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 7
  • ,
  • s
  • 2
  • 8
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 8
  • E
  • u
  • r
  • o
  • p
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • C
  • o
  • n
  • v
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • o
  • n
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • ,
  • A
  • r
  • t
  • i
  • c
  • l
  • e
  • 3
  • E
  • u
  • r
  • o
  • p
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • C
  • o
  • n
  • v
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • o
  • n
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • ,
  • A
  • r
  • t
  • i
  • c
  • l
  • e
  • 5
  • E
  • u
  • r
  • o
  • p
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • C
  • o
  • n
  • v
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • o
  • n
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • ,
  • A
  • r
  • t
  • i
  • c
  • l
  • e
  • 1
  • 4
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the contract was valid given non-compliance with procurement procedures under the Procurement Act","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Contract concluded without following tender procedures"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether valuation fees are payable based on reserve value or auction value","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Contract terms stated 2.5% of auction value"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The plaintiff, a real estate agency, claimed US$17,309.86 in valuation fees from the defendant, a statutory body, under a contract concluded in 2007-2008. The defendant terminated the contract in 2009 and appointed other auctioneers. The court raised mero motu the issue of compliance with procurement legislation.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →