{"issue_text":"Whether the applicant was given proper notice of the arbitration proceedings","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Notice was delivered to applicant's place of business; Applicant claims notice should have been served at legal practitioners' offices"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitral award is contrary to public policy of Zimbabwe due to illegal foreign currency agreement","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Agreement concluded in January 2009 when foreign currency transactions required exchange control authority; Both parties were acting illegally"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The respondent was an employee of the applicant. On 30 January 2009 the parties concluded a mutual agreement to terminate the respondent's contract of employment, awarding her terminal benefits including a laptop, motor vehicle, and US$16 000. After partial payment of US$6 600, the dispute was referred to arbitration which resulted in an award ordering payment of the remaining US$9 400. The applicant sought to set aside this award.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases