{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitral award is contrary to public policy of Zimbabwe","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Arbitrator's interpretation of statutory instruments, currency conversion at 1:1 rate"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator properly applied his mind to the issues before him","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Arbitrator's reasoning process, consideration of applicable legislation"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant contracted the first respondent to grow tobacco for the 2018-2019 season. The second and third respondents bound themselves as sureties. The respondents failed to deliver sufficient tobacco to offset a US$427,024.90 liability. An arbitrator ruled the debt should be paid in Zimbabwe dollars at 1:1 rate. The applicant sought to set aside this award as contrary to public policy.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases