{"issue_text":"Whether applicants provided reasonable explanation for delay in seeking condonation","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"No evidence of attempt to file on 15 June 2016; No explanation for delay between 11 May and 20 July 2016"}
{"issue_text":"Whether applicants have reasonable prospects of success on merits","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Allegation that Secretary lacked authority; No board meeting convened"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicants, who were retrenched by the second respondent in April 2016, failed to challenge the first respondent's confirmation of their retrenchment within the prescribed 21-day period. They sought condonation for late filing of their review application, alleging delay was due to late receipt of confirmation letter and claiming the Secretary lacked authority to confirm retrenchment without convening a board meeting.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases