{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred in law by holding that evidence of subordinate was insufficient to prove supervisors' guilt","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Herbert's evidence implicating supervisors"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred in finding supervisors not blameworthy despite being accountable for subordinates' actions","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Supervisors' duty to prevent dough mixing violations"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred in overturning guilty finding and reinstating without penalty","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Finding that penalty should have been applied"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant company dismissed two supervisors after a subordinate employee was caught mixing 14 bread breakages into dough, violating company policy allowing maximum 2 breakages. The arbitrator ordered reinstatement or damages, finding the supervisors minimally blameworthy.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases