{"issue_text":"Whether continual renewal of fixed-term contracts gives rise to legitimate expectation of continued employment","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appellants had contracts renewed multiple times since April 2012"}
{"issue_text":"Whether courts differentiate legitimate expectations between NGOs and private sectors","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Appellants argued arbitrator considered different case law"}
{"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator erred in placing burden of proof on appellants","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Appellants claimed respondent should have produced employment records"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Six employees on fixed-term contracts since April 2012 were given notices of non-renewal in December 2013. They claimed unfair dismissal based on legitimate expectation of renewal, but the arbitrator dismissed their claim. They appealed to the Labour Court.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases