Absence without leaveRetrospective leave approvalRight to be heardDisciplinary hearing
Tags
Disciplinary proceedingsLeave approvalDue process
legislation
Statutes Cited
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
A
c
t
2
0
0
3
P
o
l
i
c
e
a
n
d
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
E
v
i
d
e
n
c
e
A
c
t
1
9
8
4
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
A
c
t
1
9
9
8
Y
o
u
t
h
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
a
n
d
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
E
v
i
d
e
n
c
e
A
c
t
1
9
9
9
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
P
r
o
c
e
d
u
r
e
R
u
l
e
s
2
0
1
0
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
A
p
p
e
a
l
A
c
t
1
9
6
8
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
A
p
p
e
a
l
A
c
t
1
9
9
5
A
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
A
c
t
1
9
9
9
C
o
u
r
t
s
A
c
t
2
0
0
3
C
o
n
s
t
i
t
u
t
i
o
n
a
l
R
e
f
o
r
m
A
c
t
2
0
0
5
S
e
r
i
o
u
s
O
r
g
a
n
i
s
e
d
C
r
i
m
e
a
n
d
P
o
l
i
c
e
A
c
t
2
0
0
5
T
e
r
r
o
r
i
s
m
A
c
t
2
0
0
0
T
e
r
r
o
r
i
s
m
A
c
t
2
0
0
6
P
r
o
c
e
e
d
s
o
f
C
r
i
m
e
A
c
t
2
0
0
2
E
x
t
r
a
d
i
t
i
o
n
A
c
t
2
0
0
3
S
e
x
u
a
l
O
f
f
e
n
c
e
s
A
c
t
2
0
0
3
D
o
m
e
s
t
i
c
V
i
o
l
e
n
c
e
,
C
r
i
m
e
a
n
d
V
i
c
t
i
m
s
A
c
t
2
0
0
4
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
a
n
d
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
A
c
t
2
0
0
8
C
o
r
o
n
e
r
s
a
n
d
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
A
c
t
2
0
0
9
L
e
g
a
l
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
A
c
t
2
0
0
7
D
a
t
a
P
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
A
c
t
1
9
9
8
F
r
e
e
d
o
m
o
f
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
A
c
t
2
0
0
0
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
I
n
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
o
r
y
P
o
w
e
r
s
A
c
t
2
0
0
0
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
a
n
d
C
o
u
r
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
A
c
t
2
0
0
0
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
a
n
d
P
o
l
i
c
e
A
c
t
2
0
0
1
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
A
c
t
1
9
8
8
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
A
c
t
1
9
9
1
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
a
n
d
P
u
b
l
i
c
O
r
d
e
r
A
c
t
1
9
9
4
C
r
i
m
e
a
n
d
D
i
s
o
r
d
e
r
A
c
t
1
9
9
8
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
T
e
r
r
o
r
i
s
m
a
n
d
C
o
n
s
p
i
r
a
c
y
)
A
c
t
1
9
9
8
P
o
w
e
r
s
o
f
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
C
o
u
r
t
s
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
A
c
t
2
0
0
0
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
(
L
i
c
e
n
c
e
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
)
A
c
t
2
0
0
1
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
A
c
t
2
0
0
1
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
2
)
A
c
t
2
0
0
1
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
3
)
A
c
t
2
0
0
1
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
4
)
A
c
t
2
0
0
1
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
5
)
A
c
t
2
0
0
1
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
6
)
A
c
t
2
0
0
1
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
7
)
A
c
t
2
0
0
1
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
8
)
A
c
t
2
0
0
1
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
9
)
A
c
t
2
0
0
1
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
1
0
)
A
c
t
2
0
0
1
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
1
1
)
A
c
t
2
0
0
1
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
1
2
)
A
c
t
2
0
0
1
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
1
3
)
A
c
t
2
0
0
1
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
1
4
)
A
c
t
2
0
0
1
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
1
5
)
A
c
t
2
0
0
1
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
1
6
)
A
c
t
2
0
0
1
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
1
7
)
A
c
t
2
0
0
1
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
1
8
)
A
c
t
2
0
0
1
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
1
9
)
A
c
t
2
0
0
1
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
2
0
)
A
c
t
2
0
0
1
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the appellant was absent without official leave when leave was granted retrospectively","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appellant informed superiors by phone; leave forms approved retrospectively"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the respondent followed proper disciplinary procedures before dismissal","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Charge form not served; no hearing conducted"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant was dismissed for being absent from work for 7 days without official leave. However, the court found that he had informed his superiors by phone about his absence and subsequently submitted leave application forms which were approved retrospectively by his employer.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases