{"issue_text":"Whether successive fixed-term contracts entered into by the respondents were contracts of casual employment falling within section 12(3) of the Labour Act","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Continuous renewal of one-month contracts for periods exceeding 6 weeks"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the respondents were permanent employees of the appellant","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Continuous renewal of contracts over extended periods"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the respondents and appellant entered into successive fixed-term contracts which terminated on expiry of each fixed term","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Contracts specified termination dates"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Three employees worked for Reckitt Benckiser Zimbabwe on continuously renewed one-month fixed-term contracts for periods ranging from 1 year 3 months to 7 years 6 months. On 30 September 2010, they were orally advised not to report for duty the following day as their contracts had been terminated. The matter went to arbitration where the arbitrator ruled in favour of the employees.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases