Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court
Refayi Chikandiwa and Pameti Nyemba v Anderson Chikandiwa and Madzudzo Chikandiwa and Tarisayi Kapuya and Chamunorwa Kapuya and Village Head Kanengoni and Chief Negomo
HH 769-22
Case Details
Court
Harare High Court
Date
2 November 2022
Citation
HH 769-22
Neutral Citation
[2022] ZWHH 769
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal
Bench
Presiding
TAGU J
Full Bench
TAGU JMAXWELL J
Areas of Law
Property LawCustomary LawCivil Procedure
Keywords
land inheritancecustomary land rightsinterim interdictfunctus officioprima facie right
Tags
land disputeinheritancecustomary lawinterdict
legislation
Statutes Cited
- European Convention on Human Rights 1950, art 6(1)
- Human Rights Act 1998
- Courts Act 2003
- Constitutional Reform Act 2005
- Supreme Court Act 1981 (now Senior Courts Act 1981)
- Access to Justice Act 1999
- Criminal Justice Act 2003
- Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984
- Prosecution of Offences Act 1985
- Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996
- Criminal Appeal Act 1995
- Criminal Defence Service Act 2006
- Legal Services Act 2007
- Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007
- Coroners and Justice Act 2009
- Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
- {"issue_text":"Whether the court a quo erred in denying appellants an interim interdict when all essential elements had been met","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appellants' long-term occupation, inheritance claim, interference by respondents"}
- {"issue_text":"Whether the court a quo misdirected itself in finding no prima facie right due to two contradictory Chief's judgments","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Two contradictory judgments from same Chief's court"}
- {"issue_text":"Whether the second Chief's judgment was a nullity due to functus officio","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Second judgment issued without proper rescission process"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellants, husband and wife, sought an interim interdict against respondents who were interfering with their farming activities on land inherited from the first appellant's late father. The Magistrates Court dismissed the application due to two contradictory judgments from Chief Negomo's court on the same matter. The High Court found the lower court erred in its approach.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →
Legal Intelligence
for Africa.
for Africa.
Zalari is Zimbabwe and Southern Africa's leading AI-powered legal research platform, built by DeepCounsel and powered by Nyamaropa Technologies. Search Zimbabwe Supreme Court and High Court case law instantly, get AI-generated answers with full source citations, and access the most comprehensive corpus of Zimbabwean and Southern African jurisprudence available online. Zalari is the go-to legal AI platform for attorneys, advocates, law students, judges, and corporate counsel across Zimbabwe and South Africa — delivering faster research, smarter insights, and a competitive edge in legal practice. Zalari does not provide legal advice. Always consult a qualified legal practitioner for advice specific to your situation. © 2026 DeepCounsel — a legal technology company democratising access to legal knowledge in Africa.