Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Renee Juanita Hiten v Steven Barry N.O and The Master of High Court and The Sheriff of High Court and Registrar of Deeds

HH 858-22

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
23 November 2022
Citation
HH 858-22
Neutral Citation
[2022] ZWHH 858
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
TAGU J
Full Bench
TAGU J
Areas of Law
Property LawSuccession LawCivil Procedure
Keywords
Actio Communi DividendoJoint OwnershipProperty SubdivisionTestamentary ExecutorCo-ownershipPeregrinusSecurity for Costs
Tags
Actio Communi DividendoJoint OwnershipProperty DivisionTestamentary ExecutorEstate Administration
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • none
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the founding affidavit is defective due to being signed in Zimbabwe but notarized in South Africa on the same date","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Affidavit signed in Harare on 10 August 2022 and notarized in Somerset West, South Africa on same date"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether applicant should pay security for costs as a peregrinus","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Applicant resides outside Zimbabwe"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether there is basis for granting actio communi dividendo","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Joint ownership of property, applicant's desire to dispose of share"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether court can grant subdivision contrary to Will provisions","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Will bequeathed property in equal shares"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant and first respondent were bequeathed equal shares in a property through a Will. The applicant sought subdivision of the jointly owned property through actio communi dividendo as she no longer resides in Zimbabwe and wishes to dispose of her share, while the first respondent opposed this arrangement.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →