{"issue_text":"Whether the court should reinstate an application that was struck off the roll for failure to attach the judgment sought to be appealed","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant failed to attach judgment; application was struck off; applicant later obtained judgment"}
{"issue_text":"Whether paragraph 5 of Practice Direction 3/2013 applies to applications struck off for fatal defects","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Application was fatally defective for non-compliance with Rule 43(1)"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant filed a chamber application for condonation and extension of time to note an appeal (SC 184/20) but failed to attach the judgment he sought to appeal against. The application was struck off the roll. He then filed this application seeking reinstatement, claiming the order was a typographical error and the matter was merely removed from the roll.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases