Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Richard Chapanga and 4 Others v Multipest Services (Pvt) Ltd and The Sheriff

HH 320-13

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
20 September 2013
Citation
HH 320-13
Neutral Citation
[2013] ZWHH 320
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Urgent Application

Bench

Presiding
Takuva J
Full Bench
Takuva J
Areas of Law
Civil ProcedureContract Law
Keywords
writ of executionconsent orderprovisional interdictsuspensiondeed of settlement
Tags
urgent applicationprovisional interdictwrit of executionconsent order
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • N
  • o
  • n
  • e
  • n
  • o
  • s
  • t
  • a
  • t
  • u
  • t
  • o
  • r
  • y
  • p
  • r
  • o
  • v
  • i
  • s
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • w
  • a
  • s
  • i
  • n
  • v
  • o
  • k
  • e
  • d
  • ,
  • i
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • r
  • p
  • r
  • e
  • t
  • e
  • d
  • o
  • r
  • a
  • p
  • p
  • l
  • i
  • e
  • d
  • .
  • T
  • h
  • e
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • r
  • e
  • d
  • e
  • c
  • i
  • s
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • r
  • e
  • s
  • t
  • s
  • o
  • n
  • t
  • h
  • e
  • H
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • C
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • s
  • c
  • o
  • m
  • m
  • o
  • n
  • -
  • l
  • a
  • w
  • e
  • q
  • u
  • i
  • t
  • a
  • b
  • l
  • e
  • j
  • u
  • r
  • i
  • s
  • d
  • i
  • c
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • t
  • o
  • s
  • t
  • a
  • y
  • e
  • x
  • e
  • c
  • u
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • o
  • f
  • a
  • n
  • i
  • r
  • r
  • e
  • g
  • u
  • l
  • a
  • r
  • j
  • u
  • d
  • g
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • .
  • #
  • #
  • #
  • O
  • T
  • H
  • E
  • R
  • A
  • U
  • T
  • H
  • O
  • R
  • I
  • T
  • I
  • E
  • S
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the applicants have established a prima facie right for suspension of the writ of execution","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Order granted without consent, property seized"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the applicants would suffer irreparable harm if the writ is not suspended","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Property already seized, order granted in error"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the balance of convenience favours granting the interlocutory relief","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicants have no other remedy, matter pending in HC 7635/13"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicants sought suspension of a writ of execution issued pursuant to a court order granted on 17 July 2013 in case HC 4283/13. The order was granted in error as there was no consent from the applicants for the deed of settlement that was made an order of court. The first respondent obtained a writ of execution on 10 September 2013 leading to seizure of the applicants' property on 16 September 2013.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →