arbitral awardregistrationquantificationcash-in-lieu of leavefunctus officio
Tags
arbitration award registrationquantification of awardlabour arbitration
legislation
Statutes Cited
Labour Court Act
Arbitration Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the amended arbitral award is registrable under s 98(14) of the Labour Court Act","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Amendment made 3 years after award without respondent consent"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator was functus officio and lacked jurisdiction to amend the award","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Article 33 Model Law 30-day limit"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the claim for cash-in-lieu of leave had prescribed","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Award issued 2012, quantified 2015"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant, an ex-employee, obtained an arbitral award on 28 June 2012 for salary and severance pay but cash-in-lieu of leave was unquantified. After the 2012 registration application was dismissed, the arbitrator quantified the leave pay on 13 October 2015. The applicant now seeks registration of the amended award.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases