Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Riczone Investments (Pvt) Ltd v Tel One (Pvt) Ltd & Jadeyed Investments (Pvt) Ltd

HH 327-24

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
5 August 2024
Citation
HH 327-24
Neutral Citation
[2024] ZWHH 327
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Urgent Application

Bench

Presiding
CHILIMBE J
Full Bench
CHILIMBE J
Areas of Law
Administrative LawPublic Procurement LawCivil Procedure
Keywords
urgencydomestic remediespublic procurementtender challengePublic Procurement Act
Tags
public procurementtender disputeurgency
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act
  • Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act
  • Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act
  • Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act
  • Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act
  • Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act
  • Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act
  • Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act
  • Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act
  • Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act
  • Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act
  • Administrative Justice Act
  • Interpretation Act
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the application is urgent","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Delay in filing, availability of domestic remedies"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether domestic remedies under the Public Procurement Act are adequate and efficacious","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Existence of challenge procedure, interdict power, review panel"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether General Notice 164B exempted Tel One from the Act","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Publication date, scope of exemption"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

Riczone Investments, the highest bidder in a Tel One tender for disposal of copper cables, challenged the award to Jadeyed Investments. Riczone sought an urgent interdict to halt contract conclusion pending review of Tel One's decision. The court found the application not urgent as Riczone failed to exhaust domestic remedies under the Public Procurement Act.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →