Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Supreme Court

Riozim Limited & RM Enterprises (Private) Limited v Maranatha Ferrochrome (Private) Limited & Justice November Tafuma Mtshiya (RTD)

[2022] ZWSC 30

Case Details

Court
Supreme Court
Date
24 February 2022
Citation
[2022] ZWSC 30
Judgment No.
SC 30/22
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal

Bench

Presiding
Uchena JA
Full Bench
Mavangira JAUchena JAMathonsi JA
Areas of Law
Arbitration LawCommercial LawContract Law
Keywords
Arbitral awardInterim awardJurisdictionPrescriptionShareholders agreementSetting aside award
Tags
ArbitrationCommercial disputeShareholders agreement
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Arbitration Act [Chapter 7:15]
  • UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether an interim award dismissing preliminary objections can be set aside under Article 34 of the Arbitration Act","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Interim award issued on 10 June 2019; application made after 30-day period"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator's ruling on jurisdiction constitutes an award or a ruling","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Article 16(3) provides 30-day limit for challenging rulings; Article 34 provides 3-month limit for challenging awards"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator's decision on prescription can be challenged under Article 34","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Prescription decision was part of interim award"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The appellants, Riozim Limited and its wholly-owned subsidiary RM Enterprises, entered into a shareholders agreement with Maranatha Ferrochrome. A dispute arose regarding share transfers, leading to arbitration. The arbitrator made rulings on jurisdiction and prescription, which the appellants sought to set aside in the High Court under Article 34. The High Court dismissed the application, holding that interim awards cannot be set aside under Article 34.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →