{"issue_text":"Whether the court a quo correctly found that the appellant was not constructively dismissed","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appellant's resignation citing workplace conditions, delayed reinstatement, office conditions, contract variations"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant, employed as Personal Assistant to the Managing Director, was placed on garden leave after her position was abolished due to restructuring. After arbitration ordering reinstatement, she accepted a different position but later resigned claiming constructive dismissal due to various workplace conditions including lack of internet, shared printer, office conditions, and delayed reinstatement.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases