recusaljudicial biascorrespondent attorneyreasonable apprehension of bias
Tags
BankingRecusalJudicial bias
legislation
Statutes Cited
N
o
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
s
t
a
t
u
t
e
s
w
e
r
e
c
i
t
e
d
i
n
t
h
i
s
j
u
d
g
m
e
n
t
.
T
h
e
c
o
u
r
t
r
e
l
i
e
d
e
n
t
i
r
e
l
y
o
n
c
o
m
m
o
n
l
a
w
p
r
i
n
c
i
p
l
e
s
a
n
d
c
a
s
e
l
a
w
p
r
e
c
e
d
e
n
t
s
r
e
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
j
u
d
i
c
i
a
l
r
e
c
u
s
a
l
a
n
d
b
i
a
s
.
#
#
#
O
T
H
E
R
A
U
T
H
O
R
I
T
I
E
S
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether a reasonable, objective and informed person would apprehend that the judge would not bring an impartial mind to bear on the adjudication of the case","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Judge's former law firm acted as correspondent for respondent in other matters but not in the specific case"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The respondent bank sought the recusal of DUBE-BANDA J from hearing an application for rescission of judgment, alleging that the judge's former law firm had acted as correspondent attorneys for the bank in other matters. The application was based on the reasonable apprehension of bias test.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases