{"issue_text":"Does the application meet the requirements of urgency under the High Court rules given a 19-day delay unexplained in the founding papers?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Notice of execution 25 May 2011; application filed 13 June 2011; no explanation in certificate or founding affidavit"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Applicant stood surety for a lease that tacitly renewed and accrued rent arrears. A 2010 consent judgment ordered eviction and payment. When her immovable property was attached for sale in execution, she launched an urgent chamber application to stay execution pending her rescission application, citing non-service and non-consent.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases