Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

ROSELT MITCHELL ENTERPRISES (PVT) LTD t/a METAL COMPONENTS v HAYGOLD ENTERPRISES (PVT) LTD

HH 31/18

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
24 January 2018
Citation
HH 31/18
Neutral Citation
[2018] ZWHH 31
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Trial

Bench

Presiding
FOROMA J
Full Bench
FOROMA J
Areas of Law
Contract LawCommercial Law
Keywords
Mining equipmentGold processing plantPayment disputePre-used equipment
Tags
Mining equipment supplyBreach of contractPayment dispute
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • High Court Rules
  • High Court Rules
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether plaintiff supplied equipment in terms of the contract","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Equipment supplied included pre-used items; defendant accepted delivery without query"}
  • {"issue_text":"What sum has been paid by defendant and how much is outstanding","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Plaintiff acknowledges $163,800; defendant claims $214,000"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether parties mutually rescinded the agreement","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Defendant claims April 2015 agreement; plaintiff denies"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether parties entered alternative agreement in April 2015","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Defendant's version of cancellation agreement"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

Plaintiff sued defendant for payment of $379,345 being balance due for mining equipment sold and delivered for construction of gold processing plant. Defendant disputed amount paid and claimed equipment was pre-used and unsuitable.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →