{"issue_text":"Whether the respondent should be allowed to amend its tendered amount for Benedict Shangiwa from $18,762 to $9,067.64","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Respondent's corporate secretary initially tendered $18,762; later claimed miscalculation using wrong grade figures"}
{"issue_text":"What amount should be awarded to Benedict Shangiwa for arrear salaries and benefits","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Shangiwa claimed $22,150; respondent initially offered $18,762 then sought to reduce to $9,067.64"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicants, employees of the respondent, claimed arrear salaries and benefits after being appointed to acting capacities beyond six months in violation of the Collective Bargaining Agreement. Following a previous judgment confirming them in these positions, they sought quantification of amounts owed.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases