Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Bulawayo High Court

Ryan Lowe v Ursula Shaw

HB 139/25

Case Details

Court
Bulawayo High Court
Date
17 July 2025
Citation
HB 139/25
Neutral Citation
[2025] ZWHB 139
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
Nduna J
Full Bench
Nduna J
Areas of Law
Family LawMaintenance
Keywords
maintenance order variationmagistrates court jurisdictionsection 18 Maintenance Act
Tags
maintenance variationdivorceminor children
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Liquor Act 1992 (Qld)
  • Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld)
  • Judicial Review Act 1991 (Qld)
  • Constitution of Queensland 2001 (Qld)
  • Acts Interpretation Act 1954 (Qld)
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Does the High Court have jurisdiction to vary a maintenance order made in divorce proceedings?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"High Court issued original maintenance order as part of divorce; applicant now seeks variation"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The parties divorced in 2022 with applicant ordered to pay maintenance for two minor children. Applicant now seeks downward variation of the maintenance order. Respondent opposes on jurisdictional grounds, arguing only Magistrates Court can vary maintenance orders.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →