Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Saddam Mustafa Rashidi v Trondel Investments (Private) Limited and Own Gumbo and Gungwe Security (Private) Limited

HH 649-25

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
21 October 2025
Citation
HH 649-25
Neutral Citation
[2025] ZWHH 649
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Urgent Application

Bench

Presiding
Mambara J
Full Bench
Mambara J
Areas of Law
Property LawSpoliation
Keywords
spoliationmandament van spoliepossessionunlawful dispossessionself-helpeviction without court order
Tags
spoliationmandament van spolieunlawful evictionself-help
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • N
  • o
  • n
  • e
  • i
  • d
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • f
  • i
  • e
  • d
  • -
  • t
  • h
  • i
  • s
  • j
  • u
  • d
  • g
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • r
  • e
  • l
  • i
  • e
  • s
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • r
  • e
  • l
  • y
  • o
  • n
  • c
  • o
  • m
  • m
  • o
  • n
  • l
  • a
  • w
  • p
  • r
  • i
  • n
  • c
  • i
  • p
  • l
  • e
  • s
  • o
  • f
  • s
  • p
  • o
  • l
  • i
  • a
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • .
  • #
  • #
  • #
  • O
  • T
  • H
  • E
  • R
  • A
  • U
  • T
  • H
  • O
  • R
  • I
  • T
  • I
  • E
  • S
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether applicant was in peaceful and undisturbed possession of the cabin prior to 8 October 2025","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant's continuous occupation, personal belongings found, respondents' lack of knowledge"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether applicant was unlawfully dispossessed without consent on 8 October 2025","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Forcible barring, no court order, applicant's protest"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

Applicant alleged he was in peaceful occupation of a cabin on respondents' property from March to October 2025 until unlawfully barred on 8 October 2025. Respondents denied he was ever in possession, claiming he was an intruder. Court conducted inspection in loco which revealed personal belongings and evidence of occupation.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →