MisconductDismissalAppealReviewCitationArundel School
Tags
MisconductDismissalCitation of parties
legislation
Statutes Cited
No statutes were cited or interpreted. The Labour (National Employment Code of Conduct) Regulations, S I 15 of 2006 are mentioned only as the disciplinary framework under which the appellant was dismissed; no provision was construed.
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether failure to cite Arundel School as the employer renders the appeal and review fatally defective","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appellant cited individual officials but not the school itself"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant, a teacher at Arundel School, was dismissed for misconduct by the school's Disciplinary Authority. She simultaneously filed an appeal and a review application but cited individual school officials rather than Arundel School itself as the employer.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases