{"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator had jurisdiction when delivering award given alleged expiry of practicing certificate","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Arbitrator delivered award on 10 March 2016; applicant alleged mandate had expired"}
{"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator was biased in proceedings","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Applicant claimed arbitrator failed to consider preliminary points; no legal link between record and award"}
{"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator erred in relying on inaccurate minute book","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Applicant claimed minutes had fatal irregularities and were unsigned"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Applicant was employed by respondent's ICT Division, faced disciplinary charges, was found guilty and dismissed. Matter went to arbitration where arbitrator upheld dismissal. Applicant sought review alleging arbitrator bias and jurisdictional issues.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases