{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred in holding that the appellant should have complied with S I 15/06 when the dismissal was allegedly a nullity","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Appellant dismissed under S I 15/06, respondent had registered Code of Conduct"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator had jurisdiction despite the late referral given section 94(1)'s two-year prescription period","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Referral made within two years but outside seven-day period"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant was dismissed from employment following disciplinary proceedings conducted under S I 15/06. His internal appeal was dismissed on 23 August 2012. He failed to refer the matter to a labour officer within the prescribed seven-day period, instead doing so on 5 May 2014. The arbitrator dismissed his claim on the basis that the matter was not properly before her due to this procedural non-compliance.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases