Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Samuel Chiwomba v Julitta Helen Mhundwa

HH 659-17

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
27 September 2017
Citation
HH 659-17
Neutral Citation
[2017] ZWHH 659
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal

Bench

Presiding
CHITAKUNYE J
Full Bench
CHITAKUNYE JNDEWERE J
Areas of Law
Property LawContract Law
Keywords
Agreement of SaleBreachOccupationRentalsDamagesCosts
Tags
Agreement of SaleBreach of ContractDamagesUnlawful Occupation
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • N
  • o
  • s
  • t
  • a
  • t
  • u
  • t
  • e
  • s
  • w
  • e
  • r
  • e
  • e
  • x
  • p
  • r
  • e
  • s
  • s
  • l
  • y
  • c
  • i
  • t
  • e
  • d
  • o
  • r
  • i
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • r
  • p
  • r
  • e
  • t
  • e
  • d
  • i
  • n
  • t
  • h
  • i
  • s
  • j
  • u
  • d
  • g
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • .
  • T
  • h
  • e
  • c
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • r
  • e
  • l
  • i
  • e
  • d
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • r
  • e
  • l
  • y
  • o
  • n
  • c
  • o
  • m
  • m
  • o
  • n
  • l
  • a
  • w
  • p
  • r
  • i
  • n
  • c
  • i
  • p
  • l
  • e
  • s
  • o
  • f
  • c
  • o
  • n
  • t
  • r
  • a
  • c
  • t
  • l
  • a
  • w
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • c
  • a
  • s
  • e
  • p
  • r
  • e
  • c
  • e
  • d
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • s
  • .
  • #
  • #
  • #
  • O
  • T
  • H
  • E
  • R
  • A
  • U
  • T
  • H
  • O
  • R
  • I
  • T
  • I
  • E
  • S
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Was the appellant in breach of the agreement of sale?","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Failure to pay balance by due date; taking occupation before full payment"}
  • {"issue_text":"Was the rental rate of $350 per month justified?","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Evidence of $50 per room per month for 7 rooms"}
  • {"issue_text":"Did the appellant take occupation lawfully?","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Occupation before full payment; eviction of tenants"}
  • {"issue_text":"Was the award of costs on attorney-client scale justified?","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Appellant's intransigence and lack of bona fide defense"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The appellant purchased a property from the respondent for $15,000, paid $13,000 deposit, failed to pay the $2,000 balance by 30 June 2012, took occupation without consent, and refused to pay rentals. The respondent claimed the balance and rentals. The appellant admitted owing $2,500 but contested the rental claim. The lower court granted judgment for the respondent, leading to this appeal.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →