{"issue_text":"Whether plaintiff's claim is prescribed","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Cause of action arose 1 June 2012, summons issued 19 March 2015"}
{"issue_text":"Whether prescription was interrupted by prior litigation","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"HC 2518/15 summons not properly served, judgment rescinded"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Plaintiff claimed transfer of property based on alleged sale agreement dated 25 October 2011. First defendant denied authorising sale and raised prescription. Court found claim prescribed as cause of action arose 1 June 2012 when purchase price paid, and no valid interruption of prescription occurred.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases