Samuel Mudzingwa v Mike Appeal Organisation Limited

Key Issues

• {"issue_text":"Whether the disciplinary committee was biased by having sat on two earlier occasions","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Disciplinary committee sat twice in earlier proceedings that were vitiated"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether applicant was denied opportunity to cross-examine Mr Du Sat","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Mr Du Sat's letter was relied upon but he was not called as witness"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether applicant was given proper opportunity to cross-examine Mr Tafadzwa Jeure","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Witness was removed abruptly during cross-examination"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether respondent pre-determined the case by deducting money before determination","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"$1,000 deducted before disciplinary determination was made"}

Background